Celeb Glow
news | April 13, 2026

"Subset of above not equal to" $ \subsetneqq $ Symbol

$\begingroup$

I was reviewing my Algebra diary, and I noticed a symbol that I was not familiar to: $ \subsetneqq $.

After some research on the internet I eventually found it (through UNICODE), and found that the name was "Subset of above not equal to", but I don't understand it.

After some more search, I eventually find something here on stackexchange, but I find some conclusions a bit confusing for me.

If it means "Subset of above not equal to", how can it also mean "Subset properly included in"? Can we say that the symbol $ \subsetneqq $ equals the symbol $ \subset $?

Thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$ 2

2 Answers

$\begingroup$

The symbol $\subset$ can be ambiguous. $A\subset B$ usually allows the possibility that $A=B$, but some authors use it to mean that $A$ is a proper subset of $B$, so that $A\subset B$ implies $A\ne B$. A variety of symbols have been invented to clear up this ambiguity and make explicit whether the $A=B$ possibility is intended:

$$\begin{array}{cl} \text{Symbol} & A=B \text{ allowed?}\\ \subset & \text{probably?} \\ \subseteqq & \text{yes} \\ \subsetneqq & \text{no} \\ \subseteq & \text{yes} \\ \subsetneq & \text{no} \end{array}$$

The construction of the symbols should be clear: $A\subsetneqq B$ means that both $A\subset B$ and $A\ne B$.

The forms $\subseteq$ and $\subsetneq$ should be understood as abbreviations for the symbols $\subseteqq$ and $\subsetneqq$, which are too tall to fit into a line of text.

The Unicode name of $\subsetneqq$ is purely descriptive of what the symbol looks like: It is a “subset of” symbol ($\subset$) above a “not equal” symbol ($\neq$); hence the name is SUBSET OF ABOVE NOT EQUAL. Unicode names can sometimes be a little hard to parse; just yesterday I was puzzled by MUSICAL SYMBOL WITH FINGERNAILS (𝆳).

$\endgroup$ 1 $\begingroup$

It means proper inclusion, i.e. $A\subsetneqq B$ if and only if $A\subseteq B$ and $A\neq B$. It is used rather than $\subset$ to emphasise that there is definitely not equality between the two sets.

$\endgroup$ 4

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy