Celeb Glow
general | April 07, 2026

Signification of $\varepsilon(h)$ and $|||A|||$

$\begingroup$

Consider $f:x\in \mathbb{R}^n \rightarrow f(x):= \frac{1}{2}x^\top Ax +b^\top x,$ with $n\geq 1$, $b\in \mathbb{R}^n$ and $A\in \mathbb{R}^{n\times n}$

Check that the gradient does fulfill the following fundamental property

$$ \forall x \in \mathbb{R}^d f(x+h) = f(x) + \langle\nabla f(x), h\rangle + o(\|\textbf{h}\|) (\textbf{h}\in \mathbb{R}^d) $$Let $x\in \mathbb{R}^d, h\in \mathbb{R}^d, h\ne O_d$\begin{align*} f(x+h) &= \frac{1}{2}(x+h)^\top A(x+h) + b^\top(x+h) \\ &=\underbrace{\frac{1}{2}x^\top Ax + b^\top x}_{f(x)} + \underbrace{\frac{x^\top Ah}{2}+\frac{h^\top Ax}{2}}_{\frac{(x^\top Ah)^\top+h^\top Ax}{2}}+\frac{1}{2}h^\top Ah+\underbrace{b^\top h}_{h^\top b}\\ \text{and we know that: }& (x^\top Ah)^\top = xA^\top h^\top\\ \text{and we can write: }&\frac{x^\top Ah}{2}+\frac{h^\top Ax}{2} + h^\top b = \underbrace{h^\top\big[(A^\top + A)x + b\big]}_{\langle h, \nabla f(x) \rangle} \end{align*}We need to prove that: $\frac{1}{2}h^\top Ah = o(\|h\|) \Leftrightarrow \exists \varepsilon(h) \xrightarrow[h \rightarrow 0]{}0 $, $\|h\|\varepsilon (h) = \frac{h^\top Ah}{2}$$$ \frac{1}{2}h^\top Ah = \frac{\|h\|^2}{2}\big(\frac{h}{\|h\|}\big)^\top A\big(\frac{h}{\|h\|}\big) = \|h\|\underbrace{\big[\frac{\|h\|}{2}\big(\frac{h}{\|h\|}\big)^\top A\big(\frac{h}{\|h\|}\big)\big]}_{\varepsilon(h)} $$and $\big(\frac{h}{\|h\|}\big)^\top A\big(\frac{h}{\|h\|}\big)$ is bounded for all $h$ by $|||A||| = \max_{x\in \mathbb{R}^d, \|x\|=1} x^\top A x$$$ \epsilon (h) = \|h\|\cdot\big|\frac{1}{2}\big(\frac{h}{\|h\|}\big)^\top A \big(\frac{h}{\|h\|}\big)\big| \leq \|h\| \cdot |||A||| $$Therefore $\frac{1}{2}h^\top Ah = \|h\|\cdot \epsilon(h) \frac{\rightarrow}{h \rightarrow 0} 0= o(\|h\|)$

$\forall x \in \mathbb{R}^d f(x+h) = f(x) + \langle\nabla f(x), h\rangle + o(\|\textbf{h}\|)$

Here are my 2 questions:

1) where does the definition $\varepsilon(h) = \big[\frac{\|h\|}{2}\big(\frac{h}{\|h\|}\big)^\top A\big(\frac{h}{\|h\|}\big)\big]$ come from?

2) Is the following equivalent to the definition of the matrix norm: $|||A|||^{*4} = \max_{x\in \mathbb{R}^d, \|x\|=1} x^\top A x$. If yes, to which norm is it equivalent?

one norm$$\|\textbf{A}\|_{1} = \max\limits_{1 \leq i \leq n}{\Big(\sum_{i=1}^{m}|x_{i,j}|\Big)} = \quad \text{maximal column sum}$$

infinity norm$$\|\textbf{A}\|_{\infty} = \max\limits_{1 \leq j \leq m}{\Big(\sum_{j=1}^{n}|x_{i,j}|\Big)} = \quad \text{maximal row sum} $$

two normthe most important norm $\|\textbf{A}\| = \|\textbf{A}\|_{2}$ is not easily computed.$$\text{If $\textbf{A}$ is ssymmetric }\:\to \:\|\textbf{A}\|_{2} = \max\limits_{i}|\lambda_i|$$

$\endgroup$ 12 Reset to default

Know someone who can answer? Share a link to this question via email, Twitter, or Facebook.

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy