Celeb Glow
general | April 15, 2026

Definition of the Limes Superior

$\begingroup$

I understand what the limes superior is insofar as I know that for example for an alternating series as $a_n = (-1)^n$ which does not diverge to $\infty$, we can define the bigger accumulation point 1 as the limes superior.

What I don't understand yet though is the corresponding notation which is:

$\sup_{n \in \mathbb N} \ \inf_{k \geq n} x_k$

I understand this so far as follows:

  1. I pick one concrete $n \in \mathbb N$, say n = 3.
  2. Then I pick the infimum of the set $\{x_3,x_4,.....x_{1000},...\}$, lets call this infimum $\inf_3$
  3. Next I set n = 4. And pick the infimum of the set $\{x_4,x_5,....\}$ etc.

Naturally this sequence of infima must be monotonically falling (each set of we take the infimum of is a subset of the previous set). So, of what exactly are we then taking the Supremum of? I.e. where is my understanding wrong, since such as I understand it obviously is not making much sense...thanks

$\endgroup$ 4

1 Answer

$\begingroup$

The sequence is monotonically not decreasing, actually. Think at the sequence $(2 - 1/n)$; for $n=1$ the inf is 1, for $n=2$ is 3/2, and so on.

$\endgroup$ 5

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy